🔗 Share this article

A coalition of individuals affected by the state-led crackdown amid the 2022 "Women, Life, Freedom" protests has launched a landmark judicial filing naming 4 dozen named Iranian officials of alleged human rights violations.

Judicial Move Initiated in Argentina

The formal request for a legal inquiry to be initiated was filed within the Argentinian legal system. This action was taken by a collective of Iranian nationals aided by a human rights advocacy organization. Argentina's legal framework are noted for accepting cases based on universal jurisdiction.

The filing claims that the reaction from state security apparatus to the unrest involved "shooting live ammunition, non-lethal projectiles, metal pellets improperly used for short distances, and additional ammunition at civilians." The case further describes arbitrary roundups, custodial torture, and death sentences of individuals that allegedly persist to this day.

Confidential Names

Certain agents from within the various branches of Iran's law enforcement have been identified in the complaint, but their personal details are currently being maintained under seal.

Individual Accounts Fuel the Complaint

One of the individuals behind the case, based in Britain Mahsa Piraei, explained that the objective "is far from retribution in a personal sense, but justice and transparency." Her parent, Minoo Majidi, aged 62, was killed by gunfire in September 2022. Autopsy reports showed over 167 steel projectiles had been discharged into her back at near-contact distance. She had been on a public demonstration concerning the killing of Mahsa Amini, a young Kurdish woman who was killed in custody.

Piraei, a member of Majidi's three children, was residing abroad at the period of her parent's violent demise. She traveled back to Iran at considerable peril to pay respects at the burial site. Her sibling Roya shared a picture of herself by their resting place with her head shorn on a restricted social media account. A contact shared the photograph, which spread widely, ultimately forcing Roya to flee for Turkey.

Piraei added: "By means of official complaints and documentation the aim is to maintain records, name crimes and prevent erasure." She said her parent's killing as "not an isolated incident but part of a widespread tactic."

Additional Complainants Are Those Shot in the Eye

The additional litigants who can be identified are Kowsar Eftekhari and Mersedeh Shahinkar, both survivors of loss of sight at point-blank by paintball guns.

Eftekhari, a young student, was shot in the eye in autumn 2022. She had been in the streets for weeks, observing fellow protesters being hit by live ammunition and being beaten herself with stun devices. During a demonstration on October 12th, she was at a protest near a educational institution when a individual fired at her with numerous projectiles from a distance of about a metre. He then reportedly fired at her face when she did not comply with his order to disperse. A footage of the attack showing injuries from her face spread online, and she was eventually granted asylum in Germany.

Shahinkar, 38 at the time when assaulted on 18 October, only realized what had happened when she noticed something wet on her cheek. Fellow protesters advised her not to board an emergency vehicle for fear of being delivered to a detention center. When she finally got to a treatment facility, a staff member told her to leave because they would not treat protesters. A medical professional examined her and directed her to a medical center, where Shahinkar claimed a rock had inadvertently injured her eye so she would not be turned away. She published photos of her wounds online, and in January 2023, undercover agents came for her, leading her to flee Iran. She later received a renowned recognition as a representative of the movement.

International Law Principle Provides Basis for Complaint

The individuals initiating the legal probe state that the complaint is not viewed just as a symbolic gesture with no hope of a practical outcome. The concept enables cases to be examined in a foreign nation even if the crime did not happen in that country and the offender is not resident there. The Argentinian system has particularly permissive regulations on such claims in the world.

The concept of universal jurisdiction has previously resulted in multiple guilty verdicts and the launch of cases covering violations committed in many countries. Legal actions are presently being prosecuted in several nations worldwide.

As the application is only for a criminal investigation, and this is not a case for damages, there is no claim by the individuals for money damages. This complaint would not be the initial legal action against Iranian figures brought in Argentina.