🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial move to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and parents are watching with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are considering similar measures.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". The policy is expected to be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked parliament to pass a bill raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has suggested a related step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Dutch government has advised parents to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these services, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a useful first step," stated the parliamentarian behind the resolution.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, stating that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by conclusive research".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. However, the government pledged to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. One foundation established by the relatives of a young person who died after being exposed to harmful social media material argues that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for young users," said a prominent peer.

America: A Decentralized Approach

Stateside, regulation is primarily happening at the regional government level amid national inaction.

• Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a bill barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has approved a rule limiting minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced measures demanding parental consent for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from certain individuals to copy this path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, additional countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, international bodies take a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has warned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might backfire". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize user protection.

Even as this worldwide discussion continues, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that governments globally are increasingly content to wait for the industry to self-regulate.