🔗 Share this article

England have been eliminated from the World Cup following a defeat in a match they were heavily favored in, thanks to a surprise performance which nobody saw coming. Sound familiar? That’s because it describes two events involving England which occurred almost exactly a year apart: recently, their ODI World Cup semi-final loss at the hands of South Africa; a year ago, their loss in a must-win group stage match against West Indies in the T20 version.

What Happened Next

In the interim, there was a 16-0 Ashes debacle and a post-series review which was intended to overhaul the system. Did it? Let’s look a little more deeply into those two World Cup eliminations. In 2024, England fell to pieces, missed multiple opportunities, and allowed a aggressive batting display from Qiana Joseph to seal the match. In the latest match, a player with beautiful technique and temperament – the South Africa captain, Laura Wolvaardt – showed why she is among the elite in cricket. She gave precisely one chance – a catch to Alice Capsey at long-on – and England took it. Unfortunately, she had accumulated 169 runs by that point.

‘This will hurt’: The coach turns to next generation after England’s World Cup defeat.

It probably won’t bring the England head coach, Charlotte Edwards, much consolation as she flies home from her first World Cup as manager – she is a results driven coach, and a loss is a loss. But she has initiated positive changes. From the low point of dropping eight catches in a single day of Test cricket in Melbourne, six months later England held on to more chances this World Cup than any other team. That’s an improvement.

England’s Innings Struggles

The issue arose following Wolvaardt’s knock. Was there anyone inside that England dressing room really believe they were capable of chasing down a total of more than 300? Undoubtedly no one outside it did. England’s collapse to 0/2 and 1/3 provoked a reaction not of horror but of resigned acceptance.

“We do need to improve our batting – I don’t think it’s been consistent enough at times,” Edwards said after the match. This highlights the problem. There have been multiple totals of more than 300 in this tournament: a portion were hit by Australia, three by India, and two by South Africa. This is the new normal in women’s ODI cricket: in order to rival the world’s best, England need a batting lineup which can realistically aim to surpass 300 runs. But when only Nat Sciver-Brunt and Heather Knight has a track record of consistently scoring meaningful runs, well, you do the maths.

Collaborative Innings

Capsey’s century stand with Sciver-Brunt in the semi-final wasn’t entirely pointless – Capsey showed that she can bat sensibly, at least for 70 balls – but it was never going to be enough to win the game. Compare and contrast with South Africa, who were able to score 117 runs from their last 10 overs, exceeding the 300-run mark, because Wolvaardt had confidence in the batters following her and felt she had the liberty to attack. “Knowing what we still had in the sheds with the last 10 coming up, I thought I’d better have a swing,” she told Sky Sports.

Heather Knight and Nat Sciver-Brunt were the only England batters to score runs consistently during the tournament.

Managerial Decisions

When Edwards was appointed in April, her challenge was whether to maintain or change: she opted to give an ageing ODI side who had struggled previously one last shot at World Cup glory. She got it wrong. England come back with the least favorable outcome: empty-handed, and with no foundations on which to restructure over the next four years. Five of their top six from the semi-final are probably not featuring in another 50-over World Cup.

A change of approach is now imminent, as Edwards herself indicated. “This is the end of an ODI cycle,” she said. “We’ve got to focus ahead now.”

Upcoming Talent

Better late than never: time to look seriously at the young left-hander Grace Scrivens, the 20-year-old wicketkeeper Seren Smale and the 18-year-old left-arm spinner Tilly Corteen-Coleman.

The nagging worry is that it might be overdue: England’s latest round of central contracts were finalized on 1 October. The governing body has not yet published a full list of retained athletes, but it isn’t difficult to deduce that the existing team are the primary recipients.

Moving Forward

Stagnation and complacency were the twin problems on which the Ashes sweep was built – time for Edwards to demonstrate that she is serious about preventing their return.